Saturday, October 21, 2017

EFFECTIVE ENERGY AND PERSONALITY (Further note on food and energy and behaviour)

EFFECTIVE ENERGY AND PERSONALITY
(Further note on food and energy and behaviour)

Food is said to be the basis and in reality the only source of energy for the body. Much work has been done regarding food, and its constituents, calories, and its relation to the work performed.

Empirical observations point to the variety of experiences that need to be considered when one considers the question of effective energy available to a man. We have already seen something of the relation of food-intake to hunger etc., however, to summarise:

The number of persons complaining of lassitude, fatigue and weakness despite the fact of their consuming adequate diets is considerable - good food-intake with good digestion and absorption.

There is the example of the fewer members who have performed amazing feats of endurance against a background of starvation coupled with disabling infections like malaria, dysentery etc.

A starving person may prefer to die rather than eat prohibited food or forgo a principle. A person who had just had a full meal may be not averse to eat a tasty morsel offered by a loving friend.

Lassitude felt by a starving man  may be overcome in the company of a great leader, sharing the starvation with him.

Pleasant sights and sounds can make up for the lack of food for quite sometime.

The drive of a powerful aim or goal of life can call forth energy resources and mechanisms for their indent and use, which would look absurd or miraculous seen against the norms of the presently determined tables of human physiology.

The Hindu scriptures and the Buddha speak of the various inputs coming into the body through the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, skin, mind etc. as different kinds of food. Food is important. But to speak of it or raise it up as the central issue in human physiology and belittle all inquiry into the whole question of effective energy mechanisms available to man is not justified by the totality of human experience.

A man is a physical system open to the influence of the whole range of energies surrounding him. To a few of these he is said to be open to the extent of awareness - light, sound etc. That is to say that he can communicate these inputs to others and himself in language and patterns established within him. A large number of other influences that fall on him constantly are only felt as palpable consequences to which he assigns reasons in terms of what is social inducted into him. This habit of explaining, or what is more correctly, explaining away experiences or even the very fact of the experiences because they do not fit into the vocabulary of the most fashionable science of the day, stops any or all inquiry.

Man is in reality not only the psychological or behaviour personality etc. He is also a personality in terms of the visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory and gustatory determinants observable by other men. Being undoubtedly a physical system he is also a mechanical personality with such and such mechanical properties, a magnetic personality with such and such magnetic fields, an electrical personality with its own fields etc. These and their resultant fields also contribute greatly to the vagaries of his behaviour. He is not normally aware of influence of the ionic content of the air and the effects it has on him he explains in terms of the happenings he is aware of. This is not to preach superstition but only to facilitate openness of mind.

But it is difficult to convince a person who believes that a six valve radio is a miracle of science fallen from heaven, and who at the same time is quite sceptical of the possibility of his own brain endowed with billions of cells being capable of sending or receiving thoughts.

The functions of one’s brain and one's personality can best be approached directly by the empirical experience of the person fully using his own body and its resources in the solution of his own problems.

The man is always bigger than the science he reveals. Science, then, perpetually dogs behind putting scientific limits, an ever advancing shackle dragging behind the man walking in front, seeing whether he is still a man and literally saying - “Ah, you have climbed so high without oxygen, now we will tell you how much more you can climb or not by studying more chimpanzee or specially trained subjects. The shackles and inquisitions of science and religion become increasingly more sophisticated.

Man, like all his preceding species will walk into his future, and the seeker of personal autonomy will not be against this or that science or ism but will make use of each and every information to impress his ascendency over himself.

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

FOOD - ENERGY - HABITS

This is about lunch time. I have not had my breakfast. I feel weak. If something delays my lunch I shall be weaker, tired and angry, and not fit for much work or even for polite conversation.

I hear such talk from persons who have had to miss one meal, and who are in no real financial or other reasons for worrying about their next meal.

This relation between need for food, hunger and, behavioural efficiency requires close examination.

There is evidence to show that persons have fasted for a day to months and longer before they died.

Then there are examples of persons like Sri Aurobindo, explorers like Scott. Some fasted voluntarily or were forced to go without food. During this period some were even without adequate water, others riddled with infections, suffering with fevers and exposure to extremes of heat and cold. Many of them displayed not merely physical endurance but also exceedingly noble qualities of human behaviour. On the other hand, there are records of civilized persons who ate the flesh of their dead friends, and were even prepared to kill a fellow man for food, declaring that hunger an make a man behave like a beast - a sort of certificate for elevating the crudest average animal behaviour possible into a law for all. During famines, I have noticed that while hunger can reduce behaviour to a beastly degree in the majority of persons, it can bring out unparalleled examples of restraint and self sacrifice to the fore in the few.

R. F. Scott, 1911, in polar gear, by Herbert Ponting (1870-1935) [Public domain]

Professors of human physiology declared that about 3,000 calories per day are required by a stone cutter, and about 1,500 calories for the sedentary professor. If this were true, then it should be clear that by now the stonecutters and the professor should have been dead, seeing that in Indian conditions the reverse is the actual calorie intake in real life.

Taking life as it is lived, it does not appear that there is any exact relationship between hunger and a particular person’s intake of food. A man is starving, and yet might refuse food because he is fasting for a cause, or just because he is sulking. Another man has just eaten a meal but the invitation to a dainty dish by a dear friend finds extra space in the stomach.

If the relationship between being hungry and taking food is variable like this, the relation between being hungry, taking food and the actual effective energy output of the body is also highly variable. There are numerous persons who feel hungry, eat well, and are extremely indolent. I have already given examples of persons who voluntary or necessitously had to go without food for long periods and were extremely energetic.

These lines been written, not to prove that food is necessary or unnecessary, nor is it to support any point of view, nor to enter into arguments with social and medical statisticians often styled as social and medical scientists. Statistics arose out of the needs of gambling dens. Utterly failing to answer the needs of these dens excepting as a front to lure poor saps who trust square-roots and cubes, statistics has been taken over by governments and administrations - gambling with the lives of millions lured into paying taxes for lottery tickets for their future benefits on the basis of mathematical illusions.

My point is to show that for the human being there is no natural law connecting the state of his nutrition with the level of his behaviour, and this varies within very wide limits, if there are any. The ancestors of the present Americans could not have created the America we know, if they believed strictly in sterile water, adequate vitamin intake and four protein meals a day. I also wish to draw attention to the question of what constitutes good health and who is a healthy person: Is it the maintenance of the best average carcass with no past and future, or has it anything to do with what the carcass is supposed to do for maintaining and perpetuating itself unrelated to any purpose?

The relation between hunger-food-energy output and level of behaviour maybe examined from another angle. Though hunger, food-intake, energy outputs are at some point undoubtedly related, it can be seen that each of these items tends to form a habit pattern of its own resulting in widely varying behaviour.

We are conditioned to have breakfast at 7 a.m., lunch at 1 p.m. with a coffee break at 11 a.m. and supper at 8 p.m., with snacks at 11 p.m. to prevent night starvation, and bed tea at 6 a.m. lest hypoglycemia should supervene without warning. If a man were to miss one or two of these customary offerings, he tends to feel weak, irritable, tired and angry not because his food reserves are depleted or because his liver has gone on strike, but because of the great annoyance caused to the great Mogul, the basic conditioned reflex called the EGO, which has been thwarted in its assumed omnipotence to arrange the world around its little finger.

A delicious dish attracts hungary-reactions. If denied, it provokes anger, sulking or hyperacidity. Being offered food can be a mark of respect or affection, and its denial an inference of insult or neglect. Your accepting or rejecting the food offered might indicate your affection or disgust for the person offering the food. So, the food which is supposed to meet the energy requirements of your body becomes a means of expressing one’s emotions and attitudes and becomes an independent habit.

We have already seen that food intake is not directly related to the energy requirements by the examples cited. Under nearly similar circumstances of food intake, especially at very critical levels of lack of food some persons have shown the capacity to draw upon sources of energy not yet elucidated by the professors of human physiology, and all humanity must first await their pronouncements before they lift their little fingers. It does appear that such resources seem to become operative in the presence of intense aspiration towards a goal. One has to experiment with one's own body to experience these statements. The role of the so-called sciences of human physiology in the maintenance of humanity in its present state requires a fuller appraisal.

Meanwhile, it can be noted that lack of food (or lack of any other so-called average man's supposed needs - lack of electricity, of money, lack of opportunities to boss over others) leads to a lower level of behaviour.

“Oh, I am so irritable. Just now, excuse me. I still have not had my lunch!” In actual fact, this great hero saying this is likely to become irritable under many other circumstances also whenever something he expects does not happen. But now he gives the delay in food intake as the reason: He is proud of that and will go on to say, “Oh, what to do! Servants are lazy, and I don’t get a minute to eat my lunch. What will any normal man do! It is my body’s needs. I am not a sadhu! A minute’s examination will show the hollowness of this claim that it is the body’s need, or at least the great exacerbation of this claim. The habit of making the body the scapegoat of one’s stupidities is the most difficult to eradicate, supported as the habit is by a whole edifice of religion calling attention to the evils of the flesh, and a whole swarm of medical scientists declaring the averages of behaviour they measure as the acme to which one should rise or rather sink to.

It can be seen that the word, ‘I’ is merely a signature for a bundle of habits; and these habits once formed seek their own satisfaction and perpetuation; and that something called, ‘I’ or personal ego merely uses the body for its own satisfaction, and the most entrenched habit is for the ‘ego’ to treat the body as if it and the body are identical, that their needs and purposes are identical; and when pressed for argument, the ‘ego’ always speaks of the body’s needs for its alibi.

The personal ego is a parasitic excrescence of the body seen in its true perspective.

This false foundation has to be repeatedly looked into by a man who is interested in his own health, undeterred by the so-called normal behaviour possibilities postulated by the so-called human-sciences. First, we are brainwashed systematically to acquire some habits consistent with the present barbarous ideal average behaviour of the average man’s society, and these habits are then elevated to being the laws of human nature, providing additional support to the perpetuation of the very habits they deplore.

As with food, sex also can be seen to be largely a conditioned habit, a series of chain-reflexes which can be formed and dissolved. Similar is the case with other requirements including air and water within differing possibilities, though still undetermined and which will become exposed by some adventurous man untied to the textbook of human physiology, 1984 edition as the God-given foundation for his behaviour.

At a certain point of deprivation of these elements large number of human beings can be shown to die. All we can say is that it is generally the case. The point, however, is that under similar conditions of deprivation, while the response pattern of animals is fairly limited, in man the range is quite wide, and always awaits further widening.

Behaviour, then can be seen to be a set of habits, habitual patterns of response to situations, reinforced by prolonged brainwashing by powerful agencies with heavy investments in keeping human behaviour at its lowest and cleverest biological level. These habit patterns can be made and unmade and remade, and are certainly not unalterable laws of nature. These habits, once formed, tend to acquire a seeming autonomy and seem to exist for their own purpose irrespective of the realities of the moment.

The word, ‘I’ is the label, the tag, the conditioned habit, the foundation for other conditioned-habits that are acquired around it. This ‘I’, this ‘EGO’ is in reality, the frontal image, the sales-representative for the present man and his profit-oriented and backward-looking attitudes, the preserver of the past, the preserver of man as he is, with no future. The first pretence and deception practiced by the ego is to pretend that its interests are identical with the body needs. A few minutes serious consideration will show that almost all its so-called pleasures are highly destructive to the body - and some bearded professor comes up with the idea that there is a basic instant called, ‘Death Instinct or Thanatos’. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_drive Philosophies researches and arts I didn't proliferated, and propagated to maintain this death-oriented delusion.

However, the person aware of himself as the owner of the body, will begin to feel the presence of this other spurious ‘I’ the ‘EGO’ that has come up within him, begins to examine things for himself, begins to set his bodily resources to recast the habit-patterns  that fetter his body, and will do all he can to liberate his body into patterns of behaviour chosen by himself, to a more harmonious relationship with the world around himself.

When you are extremely hungry you can eat your friend and say that it is but natural since man is proved to be descended from animals and some animals are known to eat one another. If you are hungry and dying, you may give the last morsel you have to save your friend and say that it is your ideal of what a man should do. You have the right to make a choice. Only do not talk twaddle about laws of human behaviour. The moment you say ‘I’, you are responsible for saying so, and not a glossy bundle of bound books and philosophies, sciences, and religions.

***

Wednesday, October 04, 2017

RENUNCIATION AND DETACHMENT

These words have much religious sanction behind them, and are the most misused, and are often euphemisms for crass insensitive and irresponsible behaviour.

Constant interchange of energies is the law of life. You may call it sacrifice, you may call it renunciation. It is a continual give and take, though in nature and the human being there are different latent periods for different energies.

If you take in air do not give out you are liable to die in a few minutes.

If you take in water and do not give out you are liable to die within a few days.

If you take in food and do not give out you are liable to die within a few weeks.

If you have the habit of grabbing all you can get from the world, and do not have the habit of giving out, you may live to the Biblical threescore and ten in the human carcass but you will be dead as person.

If you go on receiving love and cannot show it you meet the same fate.

You renounce nothing, for nothing is yours. You do not even breathe - breath goes in and goes out. You are breathed, so to say. It is a humbling, ennobling health-giving and fatigue-removing thought. You say you walked and are fatigued. You, whoever you are, take credit for the work of the body. If there is a tiger behind you, your body can run another mile. But you think you are managing everything on earth and you say you fatigued and thrust this instruction on the obedient donkey called your body.

Detachment is another word for indifference. The great detached devotee who in name of detachment is indifferent to his friend's suffering does pray to God thus, “Oh, Lord, forget me! Be detached towards me!” What is asked for is aware attachment and efficient and serviceable interaction with the situation that confronts you, with compassion and love.

Much slipshod work goes under the garb of Nishkamakarma, work done with detachment towards the result. Detachment towards the result of a work certainly does not mean indifference to the processes of the work. In a country, with a heavy joint upbringing that does install any relationship between the quality and quantity of work done and the reward commensurate with it, the concept of Nishkamakarma gets vulgarised to a farce. Bearing this in mind, Krishna strongly admonished Arjuna not to confuse the minds of ignorant average persons by propagating this doctrine of action with detachment towards results. Just as Christ's admonition not to swear by God has been publicly, and blatantly flouted in practice by the law courts of Christian nations, the devotees of Krishna have vied with one another in popularising the Gita leading to its vulgarisation into most permissive doctrine to suit the taste of all and sundry who are bone lazy about all things except about the profits to make.

The primary object of the detachment recommended is to protect the perceptual equipment of person from becoming clouded by the emotion of frustration or disappointment or anger or depression that usually ensues from the appearance of a result that is not to the liking of person. The subsequent actions of this person will be predictably more harmful and unproductive.

Seeing that in real life no result can ever predicted with mathematical certainty this inunction and its practice are to be commended. One should carefully refrain from taking statistical certainty as absolute certainty. It is as true or as certain as the Sun will rise in East tomorrow is only a statistical certainty - remembering that the same brilliant scientists tell us that the Sun appeared in skies a certain X number of years ago!

***

Monday, September 04, 2017

RHYTHMS

The Indian scriptures speak of the manifest universe as Sabda Brahma - a vibratory system. Mother Mira described the universe as a system of vibrations arranged in a circle, the whole representing all the wavelengths, from the grossest to the subtlest - the grossest and the subtlest being closest to each other.

Dorothy Hodgson (Dutta), Mirra Alfassa, Paul Richard & Japanese friends in Tokyo c.a 1918
See page for author [Public domain or Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 
That the brain functions on the background of of rhythms is too well known to require emphasis.

A whole range of behavioural variations can arise against the background of disturbance in one or the other of the basic rhythms of the brain.

One interested in modifying his behaviour internally or externally over a wide range might find it rewarding to experiment and experience with practice of Japa, transcendental meditation or exposure to different kinds of music.

That the human fetus, even a few weeks old, has a functioning auditory system shows that exposure of the mother to good music be much more helpful in laying the foundations for a healthy personality in the child, much more than all other cacophonous ante natal care.
For image : By Jacoplane (well, his parents anyway) - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1276885
It is surprising that we hardly use a fraction of the knowledge available to us from modern studies, let alone deploring our neglect of Scriptural injunctions.

Rhythm is the basis of life and health.

***

Monday, August 28, 2017

THE EFFICIENCY EQUATION

If the whole universal energy be designated as E, then each unit phenomenon may be designated as e(1), as e(2) etc., and each of these can be put down as e(1) = E/s(m). That is to say that the subordinate unit phenomenon can be seen as E divided by a certain quantum of time and space.


The total E, then can be seen as an integral of e(1).e(2)...etc., which is equal to an integral of E/t(a).s, E/t(m) s(n)...E/t(x) s(y) … infinity.


The person acting here and now on the smallest zone of time and place is much more effective. Most great men have been characterised by this capacity to act thus. An average man is like a torch light, an electrocautery lighting up and resolving small, concrete problems. To act on a concrete point , to solve a concrete problem is the root of the situation. The universal energy available to such a person is indeed great. Such men do not seem to have any problem and they are able to attend to many things for they concretely attend to concrete situations as confront them and have no pending items.

Look at the fatigued, irritable face of the man pretending to carry the weight of the world on his shoulders and his incapacity to deal with any situation effectively.




***